By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:24:54 +0000

A great piece, nice job, and as I see it the debate has been using Darwin’s theory, which was a philosophy from a primate observation, someone looking for a similarity with out developed scientific proof such as
DNA. It was as Newton developed his quest into gravity by seeing an apple drop. Darwin’s position can not be a valid point in evolution anymore without the involvement of new science which includes DNA testing of all similar species not just the ape and man. If it is concluded that the DNA is so comparable in match between man and ape and no similarities with man and other animal groups, then Darwin’s theory would then be a rational argument and then it would be something to teach in school. This evolution of Darwin was the same type of contemplation and theorizing as in earlier debates of the earth being flat, that natural upheavals such as, storms, eruptions, floods,etc were Gods punishing or rewarding us. Our constant existence over the years has given us new building blocks in our intelligence to allow us to come closer and closer to finding our God’s identity. One thing that I find, as the years go by of learning is that we are less and less a perfect being or intellect and that some of us do not get the same message, because they want to act like God over others.The true reality of finding the consciousness of creationism is that everyone alive is a free,complex, individual,with many gifts, and talents included at conception and if left free will grow to their potential as long they are not influenced by government,peers, and the like.

Comments on: Does God Have a Future?

By: Steve