<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Does God Have a Future?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://choprafoundation.org/other/does-god-have-a-future-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://choprafoundation.org/other/does-god-have-a-future-2/</link>
	<description>Committed to Creating a Peaceful, Just, Sustainable, Healthy, and Joyful World.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:47:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kent S. Kokko		</title>
		<link>https://choprafoundation.org/other/does-god-have-a-future-2/#comment-702</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent S. Kokko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deepakchopra.com/?p=12307#comment-702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It was gratifying to see a theoretical physicist offer to teach Dr. Chopra something about QM.   As was apparent from the debate, Dr. Chopra has a very limited understanding of QM, and his knowledge is misapplied in an attempt to provide scientific underpinnings to his pantheism.  
As for &quot;science will not admit what it doesn&#039;t know&quot;, there is some thruth to that.   
Drs Shermer and Harris attempted to explain what science did know, and left the impression that was all there is to know.   
I wold have been happier if they said there is much that science does not know, but that imperfect knowledge does not mean that Dr. Chopra&#039;s QM mishmash is correct]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was gratifying to see a theoretical physicist offer to teach Dr. Chopra something about QM.   As was apparent from the debate, Dr. Chopra has a very limited understanding of QM, and his knowledge is misapplied in an attempt to provide scientific underpinnings to his pantheism.<br />
As for &#8220;science will not admit what it doesn&#8217;t know&#8221;, there is some thruth to that.<br />
Drs Shermer and Harris attempted to explain what science did know, and left the impression that was all there is to know.<br />
I wold have been happier if they said there is much that science does not know, but that imperfect knowledge does not mean that Dr. Chopra&#8217;s QM mishmash is correct</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: eturk		</title>
		<link>https://choprafoundation.org/other/does-god-have-a-future-2/#comment-701</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eturk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deepakchopra.com/?p=12307#comment-701</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fantastic debate. I was there. Unfortunately, the main question didn&#039;t seem to be addressed much on either side.

The scary conclusion I would get from Michael Shermer&#039;s mention of oxytocin (in this article also) is that we just produce more drugs for all human emotions. Science is the only reality. Everything is simply a chemical reaction. So, just make more pills. The lack of human touch, meaning, purpose, are all irrelevant under his microscope.

Where is the soul in the scientific community? I was once an engineer, all living in my mind. There was no real love, just chemical reactions to biological needs. It took a breakdown to discover there is more than just money, science, and things. Will our entire world need a breakdown to see that science is only a stage of evolution? 

It seems the great challenge is that science will NOT admit what it doesn&#039;t know. Doctors say, you&#039;ll die in X months, rather than, &quot;My knowledge is limited here. I only know what&#039;s in my books. Maybe there are other answers I am not aware of?&quot; 

It took how long to figure out the earth was round &#038; and not the center of the universe? Only in the last decade did we figure out black holes are what&#039;s at the center of every galaxy. How long will it take them to create some device to measure love or God? Exactly! So if they can&#039;t measure, it doesn&#039;t exist. We are back to those in power saying they are the keepers of all that is true.

Thanks for fighting the good fight Deepak! I do with there could have been more separation along Sam&#039;s line of the man-in-the-sky God and what Deepak means by a universal evolutionary force everywhere in the galaxy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic debate. I was there. Unfortunately, the main question didn&#8217;t seem to be addressed much on either side.</p>
<p>The scary conclusion I would get from Michael Shermer&#8217;s mention of oxytocin (in this article also) is that we just produce more drugs for all human emotions. Science is the only reality. Everything is simply a chemical reaction. So, just make more pills. The lack of human touch, meaning, purpose, are all irrelevant under his microscope.</p>
<p>Where is the soul in the scientific community? I was once an engineer, all living in my mind. There was no real love, just chemical reactions to biological needs. It took a breakdown to discover there is more than just money, science, and things. Will our entire world need a breakdown to see that science is only a stage of evolution? </p>
<p>It seems the great challenge is that science will NOT admit what it doesn&#8217;t know. Doctors say, you&#8217;ll die in X months, rather than, &#8220;My knowledge is limited here. I only know what&#8217;s in my books. Maybe there are other answers I am not aware of?&#8221; </p>
<p>It took how long to figure out the earth was round &amp; and not the center of the universe? Only in the last decade did we figure out black holes are what&#8217;s at the center of every galaxy. How long will it take them to create some device to measure love or God? Exactly! So if they can&#8217;t measure, it doesn&#8217;t exist. We are back to those in power saying they are the keepers of all that is true.</p>
<p>Thanks for fighting the good fight Deepak! I do with there could have been more separation along Sam&#8217;s line of the man-in-the-sky God and what Deepak means by a universal evolutionary force everywhere in the galaxy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
