<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Future of God: A New Theory of the Divine	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://choprafoundation.org/spirituality/the-future-of-god-a-new-theory-of-the-divine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://choprafoundation.org/spirituality/the-future-of-god-a-new-theory-of-the-divine/</link>
	<description>Committed to Creating a Peaceful, Just, Sustainable, Healthy, and Joyful World.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:28:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Doethtruth		</title>
		<link>https://choprafoundation.org/spirituality/the-future-of-god-a-new-theory-of-the-divine/#comment-705</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doethtruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deepakchopra.com/?p=12309#comment-705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is no future of God, because God&#039;s truth transcends time. Consequently, a new theory of the divine is not needed, only a meticulous study and return to old truths, wisdoms and precepts which were handed by God to mankind in the beginnning. If God&#039;s nature is timeless and unchanging, how can modern man, with his new theories about God, expect to become more enlightened than men, who 2000 years ago, held fast to wisdom which relied on carefully handed down oral and written traditions which maintained the same truths about God&#039;s unchanging precepts decrees and divine nature. You are trying to re-invent the wheel which will eventually turn full circle and prove to men that they have lost sight of the truth, which exists in the warnings and admonitions which lie far behind us not in front of us. Why is it that we want to look to what is not yet here, but we do not want to examine what we already have??]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no future of God, because God&#8217;s truth transcends time. Consequently, a new theory of the divine is not needed, only a meticulous study and return to old truths, wisdoms and precepts which were handed by God to mankind in the beginnning. If God&#8217;s nature is timeless and unchanging, how can modern man, with his new theories about God, expect to become more enlightened than men, who 2000 years ago, held fast to wisdom which relied on carefully handed down oral and written traditions which maintained the same truths about God&#8217;s unchanging precepts decrees and divine nature. You are trying to re-invent the wheel which will eventually turn full circle and prove to men that they have lost sight of the truth, which exists in the warnings and admonitions which lie far behind us not in front of us. Why is it that we want to look to what is not yet here, but we do not want to examine what we already have??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Carmela Leyva-Grueter		</title>
		<link>https://choprafoundation.org/spirituality/the-future-of-god-a-new-theory-of-the-divine/#comment-704</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carmela Leyva-Grueter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deepakchopra.com/?p=12309#comment-704</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Dr. Chopra,
I was fortunate enough to go see you at the Cal Tech debate.  I am a long time admirer of yours.  I even had my picture taken with your son at the event.  I think that it was really to sad that you were geered and misunderstood by th audience.  I believe that the debate tended to be at odds and each side was addressing a different issue regarding &quot;GOD.&quot;  It seemed to me that both sides were saying the same thing from a different perspective.  Which is that we need to desolve organized religion and that it is mostly mythology turned into fact. At the end of the program M.Shermer even said that he believed that we were meant to be here and it was not an accident.  But it was my understanding that the debate was suppose to be about life after death since that was the challenge on Larry King Live. So it was disappointing that that did not happen.  I wish I could see you talk more often but unfortunately I cannot afford your venues.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dr. Chopra,<br />
I was fortunate enough to go see you at the Cal Tech debate.  I am a long time admirer of yours.  I even had my picture taken with your son at the event.  I think that it was really to sad that you were geered and misunderstood by th audience.  I believe that the debate tended to be at odds and each side was addressing a different issue regarding &#8220;GOD.&#8221;  It seemed to me that both sides were saying the same thing from a different perspective.  Which is that we need to desolve organized religion and that it is mostly mythology turned into fact. At the end of the program M.Shermer even said that he believed that we were meant to be here and it was not an accident.  But it was my understanding that the debate was suppose to be about life after death since that was the challenge on Larry King Live. So it was disappointing that that did not happen.  I wish I could see you talk more often but unfortunately I cannot afford your venues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: iDeismFounder		</title>
		<link>https://choprafoundation.org/spirituality/the-future-of-god-a-new-theory-of-the-divine/#comment-703</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iDeismFounder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deepakchopra.com/?p=12309#comment-703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I made a video that I think goes along with this post nicely.  Thanks for the opportunity to comment...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a video that I think goes along with this post nicely.  Thanks for the opportunity to comment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
